Showing posts with label music. Show all posts
Showing posts with label music. Show all posts

This is the Democratic Republic of Style

Report from BBC


Photo:AP

When you got dressed this morning, how much thought did you put into your clothes? Probably not as much as a group of young men in Kinshasa who, despite living on one of the world's poorest countries, are obsessed with designer labels and fashion.

Six Lokoto comes striding across the square in front of Kinshasa's central train station, holding the hand of his minister. A more unlikely pair you could not imagine - Six, a modern-day hipster dandy, dressed in a top hat, smartly tailored black coat, red hoodie, silver pendant hanging around his neck, and, well, his minister.

"I have always known I was a Sapeur," Six says. "You feel it from the day you are born."

A Sapeur - a member of La Sape - the Society of Ambience-Makers and Elegant People.

Six is the Sapeur captain. He's just back from the catwalks of Paris, and as we sip cold bottles of Primus beer in the midday heat he explains the Sape way of life. Learning the style and attitudes of an elegant person, he says, is like studying for a doctorate in philosophy at the Sorbonne.



"It is a spiritual experience," he says. "It is like a religion." I look at his minister, who's beaming - he obviously doesn't consider this blasphemous in the slightest. As I found out, nearly everyone in Kinshasa loves the Sapeurs.

The economy in the Democratic Republic of Congo is growing at a rapid clip. People are getting wealthier. And when people have more money they spend it on more and better food, mobile phone credit, beer, going out to nightclubs and, of course, on clothes.



The next day I visit Six at his home - a small room in the dusty district of Matonge, filled with tin-roofed shacks, crumbling shops and dirt roads. It's 30 minutes and a world away from the gleaming new buildings in Kinshasa's Centre-ville. So wouldn't it be an idea to spend a bit less on clothes and a bit more on slightly more salubrious digs?

"Nothing," says Six, "is more important than fashion."

In his small room he yanks a suitcase out from under the bed, unzips it and pours out a stream of dozens of pairs of shoes, carefully picking the ones he'd like to show off.

The same with shirts, jackets, coats - he finally settles on khaki overalls, a leather jacket, jeans studded with pins and jewellery and some designer wellington boots - a combination that really shouldn't work at all but at the same time is absolutely perfect.



Some other Sapeurs last year got to star in a popular ad campaign for a famous beer brand. Those mostly older men were from Brazzaville, the capital city of the Republic of Congo just across the river. Between the two groups of Sapeurs there is the intense rivalry of neighbours. They even hold regular competitions, a combination fashion show and dance-off.


Of the Brazzaville Sapeurs, Six is scathing: "They are about cheap clothes," he says. "We are expensive. They are like secretaries - we are the bosses.

Kinshasa's Sapeurs are younger, their style more cutting edge, with influences from high fashion to hip-hop. Once Six is dressed to the nines we travel to a nearby square - his mates show up dressed in tuxedos with fluorescent patterned jackets, fur coats, and costumes that would not look out of place on a guard at the Tower of London.

They strut and bounce, dance and flounce. Everyone stops to stare, and when they are ready to have serious fun they lead an impromptu parade through the streets of Matonge.

Rush-hour traffic comes to a halt. People come out of their houses and jump up from their chairs at roadside cafes. Football games are abandoned. Kids start to whistle and shout. Within minutes we are in the middle of a crowd of hundreds. Young men sing: "We love the Sapeurs." It is chaos - unbridled pride and joy.


Now of course, I should point out that this is a country where civil war still rages a thousand miles to the east - where the democratic transition is quite arguably neither democratic nor a transition. Six weeks ago anger at President Kabila turned in to riots in which nearly 50 people were killed. The Sapeurs weren't strutting then - nobody was.

There are terrible problems here with HIV, illegal mining, and of course all that stuff that kills poor people just because they're poor: malaria, stomach bugs, car accidents, childbirth.

That's reality of course. But so is this. Night has fallen in Kinshasa. At club Why Not, Six and his friends have arrived. The bass from this club, and from dozens of clubs all around, is thumping away like heavy rain. We go in and immediately the DJ is shouting to the Sapeurs. Somebody buys a bottle of whisky. And the Sapeurs and the Congolese who love them are in the mood. They're set to dance all night.


Photos by Manuel Toledo

More from the Magazine

HOW MANY DIFFERENT SONGS CAN THERE BE?


IS SAM SMITH’S song Stay With Me based on Tom Petty’s I Won’t Back Down? What about Marvin Gaye’sBlurred Lines and Pharrell’s Happy? Are those too similar to be considered unique songs?


Let’s look back at a much older case. In 1976 there was a case against George Harrison for his song My Sweet Lord being plagiarized from the song He’s So Finecomposed by Ronald Mack. I don’t want to go over all the details of the case – but you can read a pdf of the court document here. Instead, let me focus on the parts I think are important. Note – I am not a lawyer. I think that’s obvious.
Both songs contain the same short musical phrase of “sol-mi-re” repeated 4 times. This is followed by 4 repetitions of “sol-la-do-la-do”. (this is straight from the court document)
It seems reasonable that George Harrison and others were aware of He’s So Fine since it topped the charts for 5 weeks.
I guess if there was some unknown (or not well known) song, it would be difficult to convince the court of plagiarism.
It is likely that George Harrison did not deliberately copy the song – but that doesn’t matter.

Perhaps this part of the testimony (or whatever it is called) is the most important (for me):

So maybe it is just these three notes (sol-mi-re) that caused the plagiarism. Maybe.
HOW MANY THREE NOTE SONGS?

Suppose that just three notes are like a fingerprint for a song. If that’s the case, how many songs are there? I am going to go with the same convention from the court case. Only the notes matter, not the timing of the notes. Using the “do-re-mi-fa-sol-la-ti” method of naming notes, there are only 7 possible notes. Yes, I don’t know what I’m talking about here – I am just going by this Wikipedia page on Solfege.

How many combinations of notes could you have? Let me start with a different example. Suppose I had a set of 10 notes. Maybe I can label these notes with the numbers 0 through 9. Here are some sample combinations of these three items.



Yes, those look just like actual numbers. The smallest number would be 000 and the largest 999 for 1000 total possible combinations. It might be easier to write these combinations as:



Ok, now replace the 10 digits with just 7 notes. How many combinations are there?



There are just 343 different 3-note combinations. But wait – I already know you want to complain. You are saying that there aren’t just seven notes. I understand your complaint. Really, this is like saying there are 7 colors in the visible spectrum. Really, the visible spectrum is a continuous range of light with different wavelengths. The same is true for sound. However, humans find it best to break these notes into different chunks called notes.

There are some other ways of grouping music into a different scale. Some of these music scales have as many as 12 notes. With 12 notes, you could get 1728 different sets of three notes. However, this is not the most common Western scale. And this post is not about the number of different songs, it is about the number of different songs that could cause a lawsuit. So, I am sticking with the 7 notes.

But what about the beat and rhythm of this short musical segment? According to the court document, this didn’t matter. But what if it did? In the world of music, there is a whole note. This is a note that lasts 4 beats. You can also have a half note (2 beats) a quarter note (1 beat) an eighth, a sixteenth, and a thirty-second note. That means there are 6 different “rhythm” types for each note in the sequence. That means that if you want a note, it could have 7 different “tones” and 6 different “rhythms” (yes, I am probably using the wrong terms here) for a total of 13 varieties.

With this, there could be 13 to the third power of combinations or 2197 different song melodies. Really, I think that the rhythm thing is over rated. I suspect you could break this down into just 3 note lengths in order to not sound too similar. Really, how many people can tell the difference between a quarter note followed by a sixteenth note vs. a quarter note followed by a thirty-second note? I doubt that I could.


Ok. One more silly point. In Western music, a 4/4 beat has 4 beats in a measure (I think that’s what it’s called). That means that in one measure of music, you couldn’t have 4 whole notes. This assumes this three note melody would fit into one measure and that the song would be in 4/4 time which of course neither have to be true.

In the end, I am going to go with 7 different notes with no distinction due to rhythm. This means that there will just be 343 different songs. But of course, I am not the first one to try to calculate the number of different songs. Rachel Hall (a music professor) used 16 beats (7 notes each) to get a value over 30 trillion. I think that is indeed a valid estimate, but I am still going to use the 343 value.
ONE SONG TO RULE THEM ALL

Here is my plan. I am going to write one song. This one song will have every possible 3 note sequence. If this song then makes it to the top of the charts, every following song will be based on my One Song and thus owe me royalties…..profit.

If I go with the “sol-mi-re” structure repeated 4 times, I can estimate how long it would take to play my chart topping song. Each “sub song” will be 3 notes repeated 4 times for a total of 12 notes. If each note lasts 0.2 seconds (any shorter and it doesn’t sound like a melody) then 343 sub songs would take 12*343*(.2 seconds) = 13.7 minutes. That’s a long song, but not crazy out of control long. It’s short enough to make it to the top of the charts. Just as a side note – songs on radio are “around” 3 minutes long. There’s a reason for that.

Ok, now for the song. Are you ready for this? Here it is – I made it just for you (and for me).







I created this song as a program in the MIT Scratch online programming tool. Yes, it’s not much fun working with a graphical interface, but it plays sounds. I was going to make my stick figure animated too, but I will leave that for others to work on.

So that’s it. All I need to do now is to get my song on the radio and make it to the top of the charts.

culled from : www.weired.com 
images from : www.weired.com